Who are these International Bankers?

Custom Search

[Oskar]

You mention Babylon using money and power as a control tactic, but that poses a question:


Who are these International Bankers who control all the money, and in turn OWNS most countries, by putting them in debt? Who are these people, and what religion do they CLAIM to represent. Please just give I man a simple and direct answer.


Ras Nevoe

Actually I find this to be an interesting question. Few people take the time to really think about the world economy and how it works.

 
 "No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon/money."
  -Luke 16:13
 
  So please keep the supremacist agenda out of this and just answer the question.

[I ELIJAH I]

  So please keep the supremacist agenda out of this and just answer the question.

First of all what is "the supremacist agenda"?  So what "religion" international bankers claim to represent is a question about world economy? NAH!!!! Why did he ask what "religion" they claim to represent as if it is only one? Bon appetit'.

[Oskar]

What is the supremacist agenda? To achieve supremacy I guess, or to uphold the illusion of it so as to rule the people.

The question about what religion the world bankers represent is not about economy per se but I think it would be interesting to know still what is in the minds and hearts of these people.

[I ELIJAH I]

What is the supremacist agenda? To achieve supremacy I guess, or to uphold the illusion of it so as to rule the people.

And who is doing that and how, and what evidence do you have of this?

The question about what religion the world bankers represent is not about economy per se but I think it would be interesting to know still what is in the minds and hearts of these people.

And what would the religion they claim to represent necessarily tell you about what is in their hearts and minds?
Posted on: January 29, 2008, 11:17:16 pmAnd you did not answer my question as to why you thought New Low would presuppose that international bankers represented only one religion.

[Oskar]

And who is doing that and how, and what evidence do you have of this?

I asked in the first post to leave the supremacy agenda out of this but you seem bent on it.

And what would the religion they claim to represent necessarily tell you about what is in their hearts and minds?

If they are honest it would. You seem to know them, why don't you tell more?

And you did not answer my question as to why you thought New Low would presuppose that international bankers represented only one religion.

I never thought that. I'm interested in any information you have though.

[I ELIJAH I]

I asked in the first post to leave the supremacy agenda out of this but you seem bent on it.

How so? Because I ask for clarification?

If they are honest it would.

And if frogs had wings they would not bump their ass when they fly.

I never thought that.

I didn't say you thought that. I am asking your opinion of why you think he would do that.

[NegusNegustiality]

Ises,
 this video should fit right into this vibe and take it to a more reality based vibe.  Mek wi tun the machine pon satan! 

Haile I

[natty threads]

At the risk of sounding like a conspiracy theorist, I actually have looked into this a fair bit.

I cannot elucidate much- I no longer think about these things if I can help it-

Oskar, Ras_Nevoe, in my opinion, much of the Illuminati, NWO, Bildeberger (sp) conspiracy theory does hold some water.

In my opinion, they do use Freemasons as a front. The lower level Masons do public service; the upper level Masons through a variety of other organizations and associations run the world.

BUT I have Jesus now, so I don't think about this much.

First got into it researching Mediaeval art, Knights Templar, then the Masonic roots of my own country, the US.

Just typing this is making me ill.

Gotta go right now.

God bless.

[NyaInIJahLove]

I would say they represent Mammon.
I would say they are capitalists.
I have heard that some are part of the occult "skull and bones' Masonry order.
So what if some are of Jewish descent? that does not make them Jewish, I have already quoted Ible scripture about REAL Jewishness, which resides in the Heart of Jah lovers....
are you suggesting we should be prejudiced against Hebrew people because of the actions of some?
that sounds like bigotry to I.
Hebrew people are a microcosm of all people, within their people lies diversity, all kinds of people.
that fact that some are extremely wealthy despite thousands of years of persecution just illustrates I point that they are shrewd and clever people.
Of course some are immoral, did not Jah warn them and grow angry at them for the mistakes they have make through recorded time, spoken within the Torah?
I think the actions of some should not be held against the all, that is ignorance.
Why all this glorification of Egypt? they were/are not all sweet and light either....
I remember the initiation, jumping the backs of crocodiles, if fear was felt, they would eat us, I felt fear, I was eaten.....some kind of "Higher Order" do you think?
I beg to differ....
there are good and bad traits in all of us....
and in every culture too.
to think otherwise would be unrealistic..
as for these bankers, they will get what is coming to them, and I pity them when they awaken from their money-lust induced slumber, coz they gonna hafe face demselves and it won't be fun.
But I won't look at all Jewish people with the kind of hatefulness that Hitler had.....
that would be denying the origins of I faith,
the Love that the Nazarene brought to we...
and the uprightness of His Majesty
OneLove Nyah I

[Oskar]

How so? Because I ask for clarification?

No. You been on about it since the start, that's why.

I didn't say you thought that. I am asking your opinion of why you think he would do that.

You did actually but never-mind. I don't think he mentioned they are all the same religion. If they do have a religion I would still be interested to know though.

Posted on: January 30, 2008, 01:16:35 amThank you NegusNegustiality, natty threads and NyaInIJahLove for the input. All interesting stuff.

[I ELIJAH I]

No. You been on about it since the start, that's why.

How so? Because I want to know what your talking about? You still haven't answered my questions.


Posted on: January 30, 2008, 01:37:30 am

You did actually but never-mind. I don't think he mentioned they are all the same religion. If they do have a religion I would still be interested to know though.

First of all he presupposed that "they" had a religion by asking "what religion do they claim". Presupposing that they(international bankers) claim "a" religion and not "which religions" also implies that it is the same one. So my question as to why you think he would do that remains.

[Oskar]

How so? Because I want to know what your talking about? You still haven't answered my questions.

My main question is who are these International Bankers.

First of all he presupposed that "they" had a religion by asking "what religion do they claim". Presupposing that they(international bankers) claim "a" religion and not "which religions" also implies that it is the same one. So my question as to why you think he would do that remains.

If you ask what I think, I think you are nitpicking words.

[natty threads]

Ah. Is someone trying to make this a Jewish thing?

That went right over my head.

I didn't get that at all.

The religion they are, in my opinion, is Freemasons/Illuminati.

Reminds me of that joke attributed to Abraham Lincoln.

Q: How many legs does a pig have?
A: Four.
Q: If I say his tail is a leg then how many legs does a pig have?
A: He still has four legs. Just because you say his tail is a leg doesn't make it one.

Not even if the pig says his tail is a leg and not even if the tail really really wants to be a leg does that make it a leg.

God bless.

[I ELIJAH I]

My main question is who are these International Bankers.

Then why not just ask or research instead presupposing the existence of "supremacist agenda" that you cant even explain?

If you ask what I think, I think you are nitpicking words.

I asked why you think New Low would make such erroneous implications, Not what you think in general, JAH forbid.

[Oskar]

Then why not just ask or research instead presupposing the existence of "supremacist agenda" that you cant even explain?

The presupposition of a supremacist agenda was from your reply in the original thread. Starting a new thread I was trying to leave that behind.

I asked why you think New Low would make such erroneous implications

Once again I don't think that. You think that. Don't try to put that on me. What's wrong with you?